Recently I have been hearing many different conversations taking place about whether or not it's worthwhile for a photographer to have a publicist on retainer. After having several different experiences, I thought it might be helpful to share what I have learned when it comes to outsourcing publicity.
In favor of PR, great publicity can yield a direct result of business growth. It can also build credibility with your clientele as an editorial feature has much more clout than a purchased advertisement. I have found smaller, specific, targeted publicity particularly beneficial. While my work has been featured in a few major magazines, other than bragging rights they have never turned into actual dollars. Meanwhile, I was placed on the front page of our state newspaper about a year ago through a contact I established at a local networking event and I can attribute tens of thousands of dollars of phone calls from that one placement. How wonderful!
On the negative side, I have come to believe that it's very difficult to get a return on investment from investing in a large public relations effort as a small, service oriented business. By nature, selling time changes the nature of what we do and therefore we cannot compare ourselves to other types of organizations which can afford a large PR retainer. If we sold purses, for example, and the purses got into Oprah's O-List, then the PR would pay off within 24 hours of that big placement with lots of online orders. But if a photographer receives one big placement from several months of an expensive retainer, it would be extremely difficult for the investment to be worthwhile when selling just your time. The reason being that you might get some inquiries trickling in as a result of the press you get, but it's not like someone can go on your site and purchase large quantities of something within that second which would make a large PR investment worthwhile.
I have found that many PR professionals promote an expensive, long term agreement with a lot of promises and not a lot of results or follow up saying that you have to 'be patient' because "good PR takes a while." I would discourage someone from entering into a contract with this type of premise. Another PR professional I once interviewed wanted to charge me to do "research" of my industry, which I promptly walked away from. If someone is not educated on your business, I believe they should learn it on their time.
I believe in hiring various people on an hourly, project, or workshop basis to run events, brainstorm ideas and look over a plan - but I don't believe a small boutique photography operation can receive a positive return on investment from a large monthly retainer situation. I also believe that if you do hire any type of PR person, they have to be someone you can see and talk to often, and micro-managed to that extent with VERY specific, measurable, time-specific goals of what you want to get out of them with very regular, scheduled follow-up meeting where you ask them where they are at with each goal you outlined. Because otherwise, they can just sort of float around, talk to you to people they know at parties and charge you a huge monthly fee.
So with publicity, I have interviewed quite a few people in the PR industry who are very convincing at selling large PR investments with side caveats of "being patient" while requesting large retainers. With that said, I know of several people who have been very successful investing in smaller fees for specific tasks like writing a PR release, crafting a pitch, or promoting an event. Please share your own experiences and questions in the comment box below!
